WhatsApp

Crimes Against Property

Theft with force in things

Contact
Inicio

Reconocido como uno de los mejores abogados penalistas 2026

Joaquín Sugrañes ha sido incluido por el prestigioso directorio Best Lawyers entre los mejores penalistas de España

Abogado especialista derecho penal y defensa jurídica

As with the crime of theft, robbery also punishes the act of taking another’s personal property for profit . However, the main difference between the two crimes is that, in robbery, the theft is committed by using force against the property or violence or intimidation against the person , a circumstance that explains the more severe penalty.

 

Specialists in Theft Crimes

A robbery with force is committed by anyone who seizes another’s personal property by using force to gain entry to or leave the place where it is located . This type of crime carries a prison sentence of 1 to 3 years , which increases to 2 to 5 years if any of the circumstances provided for in section 235 of the Penal Code (aggravating circumstances for the crime of theft) occur.

However, it should be clarified that if the perpetrator uses force on the property, but does not do so to gain entry or exit, the act must be classified as theft. For example, breaking a vehicle window to steal the vehicle itself constitutes theft. Conversely, if the window is broken to steal the objects inside the vehicle, this constitutes theft with force.

  • What is meant by “force in things”?

    Article 238 of the Penal Code helps us define this concept, as it includes a series of cases that fall within the concept of force on objects:

    1. Escalation , understood as those cases in which height constitutes a barrier to protect the property. For example, someone who accesses a private property by climbing a four-meter-high wall to steal another’s personal property will be punished as the perpetrator of the crime of theft with force.
    2. Breaking of a wall, ceiling or floor, or breaking of a door or window .
    3. Breaking into closed or sealed cabinets, furniture or objects, or forcing their locks or discovering their keys .
    4. Use of false keys , including lock picks or similar instruments, legitimate keys lost by the owner or obtained through the commission of a crime, or any other keys not intended by the owner to open the lock. Keys also include magnetic or perforated cards, remote controls or opening instruments, and any other similarly effective technological device (Article 239 of the Criminal Code).
    5. Disabling of specific alarm or guard systems .
  • Theft in an inhabited house or building or premises open to the public (Art. 241 CP)

    On the other hand, the Penal Code imposes a more severe penalty on theft committed in an inhabited home or in buildings or premises open to the public, or in any of their dependencies . In such cases, a prison sentence of 2 to 5 years is imposed.

    The aforementioned provision applies to two different situations: on the one hand, burglary in an inhabited home and, on the other hand, burglary in buildings or premises open to the public.

  • Burglary in an inhabited house

    On the one hand, in relation to burglary of an inhabited house, one of the most problematic aspects of this crime lies in determining when we are dealing with an “inhabited house.” The Penal Code itself specifies that an inhabited house is any shelter that is the residence of one or more persons , even if those persons are not present at the time of the burglary. Likewise, the following are considered to be the outbuildings of an inhabited house or of a building or premises open to the public: its patios, garages, and other fenced spaces adjacent to the building , which are connected to the interior and form a physical unit with the building.

    In this case, the harsher penalty is explained by the violation of the right to privacy and the danger that the commission of the crime entails for the people living there.

Success stories

Acquittal for the crime of theft

Crimes Against Property

We are a law firm specializing in theft crimes in Barcelona . Therefore, in this case, the client, once he learned that the Public Prosecutor’s Office was seeking a prison sentence, decided to turn to our firm to defend his interests in the trial. Specifically, our work focused on casting doubt on and highlighting to […]

Read more

We recovered possession of our client’s property and obtained compensation for the economic damage caused by the occupation of their property.

Crimes Against Property

The client came to our office after learning that two industrial warehouses belonging to him had been occupied. As lawyers specializing in squatting crimes in Barcelona , we quickly acted, filing the corresponding complaint and requesting precautionary eviction measures. While we managed to regain possession in a short time, the fact is that the client, […]

Read more
See all cases

Servicios relacionados

Damages

The crime of damage is regulated in articles 263 to 267 of the Penal Code, within Title XIII.

Learn more
Ver todos los servicios

Opinions as a criminal lawyer

Your best outcome starts with expert legal defense

The best guarantee of success in a criminal case is having excellent legal counsel.

Call us now and we will assist you immediately.
+34 618 306 891

+34 618 306 891

Or, if you prefer, fill out the following form and we will respond as soon as possible.