Reckless Driving: Crime of Manifest Contempt for Life
Last updated:
Article 381.1 of the Criminal Code punishes any person who, with manifest disregard for the lives of others, engages in the conduct described in Article 380 of the same code, that is, driving a motor vehicle or moped with manifest recklessness.
What do we mean by reckless driving?
According to the Supreme Court, reckless conduct involves a blatant and abnormal disregard for traffic regulations, clearly discernible by an average citizen (STS 363/2014). Recklessness, to constitute a crime, must be patent, clear, and obvious.
What is the difference between the crime under Article 380 and Article 381 of the Criminal Code?
The issue to be specified for the application of this crime, and not the crime of reckless driving under article 380 of the Penal Code, is to determine when there is manifest disregard for the lives of others , an element required by the crime and which must be proven in order to be criminally responsible for this crime.
According to the jurisprudence of our Courts, manifest disregard for the lives of others constitutes not only a state of indifference to the potential harm of others, but also the commission of extremely dangerous conduct. Therefore, legal doctrine often refers to this offense as suicidal driving or homicidal driving.
In short, this crime is applicable when the perpetrator carries out the conduct described in Article 380 of the Penal Code (manifestly reckless driving), but with an additional and indispensable element: the driver must realize the high probability that his or her behavior will cause an accident and, despite this, continue with his or her actions.
In this sense, the crime described in Article 381 of the Penal Code is an aggravated form of reckless driving and, consequently, is punishable by a heavier penalty. It is a crime that was initially created to prosecute specific behaviors that, at a given time, caused particular social alarm, the so-called “suicidal drivers.”
In what cases has the crime against road safety, as provided for in Article 381 of the Penal Code, been established?
This crime has been applied in cases of driving vehicles in the wrong direction, at a speed exceeding the permitted speed, on highways with heavy traffic, forcing several vehicles to avoid the reckless driver who, through his conduct, represents and admits the possibility of threatening the life or integrity of persons (STS 1464/2005).
This crime has also been found in cases involving driving a vehicle at high speed in a parking lot with the lights off, running over several people (STS No. 8/2011).
What penalty is imposed for the commission of the crime of manifest contempt?
The applicable penalty varies depending on whether the life or safety of persons has been specifically endangered, that is, whether specific road users, or third parties, have been identified in the specific case as being at risk of injury or death. If so, the offenses are punishable by prison sentences of two to five years , a fine of twelve to twenty-four months, and deprivation of the right to drive motor vehicles and mopeds for a period of six to ten years .
On the other hand, if the conduct has only posed an abstract danger to the life or integrity of people in general, but no one in particular is identified, the prison sentence and the fine to be imposed are significantly less: imprisonment of one to two years and a fine of six to twelve months .
However, the duration of the penalty of deprivation of the right to drive motor vehicles and mopeds remains the same, for a period of six to ten years .
What happens if, as a result of committing this crime, other drivers or pedestrians are killed or injured?
As with the crime of reckless driving under Article 380 of the Criminal Code and the crime of speeding or driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs under Article 379 of the Criminal Code, in cases where, in addition to the risk to life or safety of persons, a harmful result occurs (for example, the death of a person), we are faced with a combination of crimes.
However, as provided for in Article 382 of the Criminal Code, the judge will only apply the most serious crime, imposing the corresponding penalty in its upper half.
Furthermore, in these cases, the Court will always order the perpetrator to pay the civil liability arising from the crime (for example, by requiring him to pay compensation to the victim for the injuries caused).
Joaquín Sugrañes es abogado en ejercicio desde el año 2012, y se ha dedicado desde el inicio de forma exclusiva al Derecho penal. Durante sus años de ejercicio, ha intervenido ejerciendo labores de defensa y acusación en todo tipo de procedimientos penales. Su amplia experiencia en todo el proceso penal, le ha llevado a asumir la defensa y acusación, tanto de particulares como de empresas, en asuntos penales de gran complejidad y repercusión mediática en nuestro país.
The Supreme Court has handed down a landmark ruling for the defence of criminal offences against road safety. In its ruling STS No. 850/2025 of 16 October, the Second Chamber establishes that a person who drives a vehicle after having served a full sentence of deprivation of their driving licence does not commit a crime, […]
In an increasingly demanding criminal law environment, where specialisation makes the difference between a generic defence and an effective defence, Joaquín has established himself as a criminal lawyer, with a career focused on cases of greater legal complexity and social sensitivity. His professional practice is characterised by rigorous, strategic and deeply technical defence, always aimed […]
The offence of sexual assault constitutes one of the most serious crimes against sexual freedom and is characterised by a high level of legal and evidentiary complexity. Its regulation has undergone significant reforms in recent years, which requires up-to-date technical knowledge of both the Criminal Code and the case law of the Supreme Court and […]
Para ofrecer las mejores experiencias, utilizamos tecnologías como las cookies para almacenar y/o acceder a la información del dispositivo. El consentimiento de estas tecnologías nos permitirá procesar datos como el comportamiento de navegación o las identificaciones únicas en este sitio. No consentir o retirar el consentimiento, puede afectar negativamente a ciertas características y funciones.
Funcional
Always active
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es estrictamente necesario para el propósito legítimo de permitir el uso de un servicio específico explícitamente solicitado por el abonado o usuario, o con el único propósito de llevar a cabo la transmisión de una comunicación a través de una red de comunicaciones electrónicas.
Preferencias
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para la finalidad legítima de almacenar preferencias no solicitadas por el abonado o usuario.
Estadísticas
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que es utilizado exclusivamente con fines estadísticos.El almacenamiento o acceso técnico que se utiliza exclusivamente con fines estadísticos anónimos. Sin un requerimiento, el cumplimiento voluntario por parte de tu proveedor de servicios de Internet, o los registros adicionales de un tercero, la información almacenada o recuperada sólo para este propósito no se puede utilizar para identificarte.
Marketing
El almacenamiento o acceso técnico es necesario para crear perfiles de usuario para enviar publicidad, o para rastrear al usuario en una web o en varias web con fines de marketing similares.